Which type of discovery might take longer due to the overhead of triggering multiple operations?

Probe discovery can indeed take longer due to the overhead associated with triggering multiple operations. This type of discovery involves the use of probes, which are lightweight scripts that are deployed to gather data about devices in the network. Each probe needs to perform its task, which can include sending queries and waiting for responses from the managed devices.

Because probe discovery initiates separate data collection processes for each device, the cumulative effect of these multiple operations can lead to increased time consumption. Additionally, if there are a significant number of devices or if the network is particularly complex, the overhead from managing numerous probes can slow down the overall discovery process. Consequently, while each individual probe may operate quickly, the overall execution can be hindered by the need to manage multiple concurrent operations.

In contrast, other types of discovery may employ different methodologies that optimize or streamline the discovery process. For instance, pattern discovery relies on predefined patterns to gather configuration data, which can lead to quicker identification of services and applications. Combined discovery, engaging both probe and pattern methods, may balance speed and detail but can still be more efficient than pure probe discovery. Concurrent discovery focuses on executing tasks simultaneously, which generally aims for speed rather than the inherent delays caused by triggering various operational scripts.